This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FORD, L. T.
Right arrow Articles by KEY, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by FORD, L. T.
Right arrow Articles by KEY, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1950;32:257-306.
© 1950 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


AN EVALUATION OF MYELOGRAPHY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF INTERVERTEBRAL-DISC LESIONS IN THE LOW BACK

LEE T. FORD M.D.1 and J. ALBERT KEY M.D.1

1 Department of Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis

1. Myelograms have been performed in 253 cases of low-back pain with or without sciatica; 206 patients operated upon and the spinal canal was explored.

2. One hundred and thirty-seven positive and twelve negative myelograms were confirmed at operation.

3. Minor discrepancies were noted in seventeen cases or 8.3 per cent., and major discrepancies in forty cases or 19.4 per cent.

4. In 230 cases, 3.3 cubic centimeters of pantopaque was used with ten reactions. In twenty-three cases, larger amounts (6.6 to 17 cubic centimeters) were used with six reactions or 26 per cent. Use of more than 3.3 cubic centimeters was found to be of doubtful value and, even though most of the medium can be removed, the technique is not to be recommended because of the higher incidence of reactions.

5. The presence of an intervertebral-disc lesion and its probable location should be determined from the history and physical examination. If operative treatment is decided upon, the patient may or may not be subjected to a preoperative myelogram.

6. Such a myelogram is a valuable aid in diagnosis and may be a decisive factor in borderline cases. In cases in which operation is clearly indicated, a negative myelogram should be ignored.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?