This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McBride, E. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McBride, E. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1949;31:385-399.
© 1949 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


A MORTISED TRANSFACET BONE BLOCK FOR LUMBOSACRAL FUSION

Earl D. McBride M.D.1

1 OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA

Lumbosacral fusion must be considered in light of the newer concepts developed through surgical treatment of herniated intervertebral discs. Structural faults must be re-evaluated. Stabilization by fusion is still the treatment of choice in lumbosacral instability, irrespective of the spectacular results obtained after removal of the disc without fusion. Pseudarthrosis, especially of the fourth and fifth lumbar segments, has been found frequently after the regular types of fusion, and a special technique is necessary.

The technique described for accurately impacting a mortised transfacet bone block under interlaminal distraction has the following advantages:

1. The period of confinement in bed is increased very little over that required for simple removal of a herniateti disc.

2. The fusion technique adds thirty minutes or less to the time involved in removing a herniated disc.

3. There is a minimum amount of mutilation of the spinal structures.

4. The articular facets are fused, which is of mechanical advantage.

5. The bone block rigidly stabilizes interlaminal motion, immediately after being countersunk into position.

6. Extension of the spine after operation locks the bone grafts firmly into position.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
E. N. HANLEY and S. M. DAVID
Current Concepts Review - Lumbar Arthrodesis for the Treatment of Back Pain
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 1999; 81(5): 716 - 30.
[Full Text]