This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Caldwell, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sheppard, W. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Caldwell, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sheppard, W. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1948;30:971-980.
© 1948 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


CRITERIA FOR SPINE FUSION FOLLOWING REMOVAL OF PROTRUDED NUCLEUS PULPOSUS

Guy A. Caldwell M.D.1 and William B. Sheppard M.D.1

1 Department of Orthopaedics, Ochsner Clinic, New Orleans

The results of this study in proved cases of protrusion of the nucleus, there to seven years after laminectomy without fusion, suggest the following answers to the questions propounded earlier in this discussion:

1. Excellent ans satisfactory results can be obtained in as high a petcentage of cases by laminectomy alone as by the combined operation.

2. Hypertrophic changes of variable degree, with or without narrowing of the disc, occurred in 69.3 per cent. of the cases studied.

3. Functional end results do not correlate with or depend upon the presence or extent of such postoperative changes.

4. The end results are not significantly related to the existence of anomalies.

5. Recurrences took place in 8 per cent. of the cases studied, but did not seem to relate to the presence of anomalies or postoperative narrowing of the disc and hypertrophic changes. The number of recurrences was small, and there was nothing in the preoperative history and findings which indicated that protrusion would occur again at the same or another level.

Most of the unsatisfactory results (other than recurrence of protruded disc) were such that spine fusion would not have improved them.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
F. E. STINCHFIELD and W. A. SINTON
CRITERIA FOR SPINE FUSION WITH USE OF "H" BONE GRAFT FOLLOWING DISC REMOVAL: Results in One Hundred Cases
Arch Surg, October 1, 1952; 65(4): 542 - 550.
[Abstract] [PDF]