This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cleveland, M.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, F. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cleveland, M.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, F. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1948;30:302-312.
© 1948 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


PSEUDARTHROSIS IN THE LUMBOSACRAL SPINE

Mather Cleveland M.D.1, David M. Bosworth M.D.1, and Frederick R. Thompson M.D.1

1 Orthopaedic Service of St. Luke's Hospital, New York City

1. The percentage of pseudarthrosis developing in spine-fusion operations in the lumbosacral region may be reduced by an adequate amount of bone of good texture, firmly implanted and free from infection.

2. The possibility of pseudarthrosis should be discussed with the patient before operation in every instance, so that he is forewarned, and so that consent for repair may more readily be obtained, when necessary.

3. One should avoid covering any greater number of spinal intervals than are absolutely essential in performing a fusion at the lumbosacral juncture, but the fusion should always extend to and include the sacrum.

4. For statistical and practical purposes, it is useless to report a series of spine fusions at the lumbosacral juncture without control of the series by biplane roentgenograms, taken with the patient in flexion and extension, and with right and left bends. The roentgenograms should then be accurately superimposed. Furthermore, even with such roentgenograms, a few instances of pseudarthrosis in any series will fail to be recognized.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
E. E. Rutherford, L. J. Tarplett, E. M. Davies, J. M. Harley, and L. J. King
Lumbar Spine Fusion and Stabilization: Hardware, Techniques, and Imaging Appearances
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2007; 27(6): 1737 - 1749.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
E. N. HANLEY and S. M. DAVID
Current Concepts Review - Lumbar Arthrodesis for the Treatment of Back Pain
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 1999; 81(5): 716 - 30.
[Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. C. T. CARPENTER, M. J. W. DIETZ, K. Y. K. LEUNG, D. A. HANSCOM, and T. A. WAGNER
Repair of a Pseudarthrosis of the Lumbar Spine. A Functional Outcome Study*{{dagger}}
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 1996; 78(5): 712 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text]