This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CROSBY, E. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by CROSBY, E. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1946;28:809-812.
© 1946 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


A SURGICAL PROCEDURE FOR REPAIR OF RECURRENT DISLOCATION OF THE SHOULDER JOINT

A Preliminary Report

EDWARD H. CROSBY 1

1 Medical Corps, United States Naval Reserve

Operations were performed in thirty-two cases,—thirty men and two women. Their ages ranged between eighteen years and thirty-four years. Twelve dislocations occurred in the right shoulder; sixteen occurred in the left shoulder; and two were bilateral. In eight cases the first dislocation occurred during combat fighting, in thirteen while engaged in athletics, in seven from a fall, and in one while rolling a barrel; in three cases the cause was not remembered. The treatment after the first dislocation varied: No treatnment was given in fifteen cases, a sling was used for less than three weeks in twelve cases and for three weeks or more in four cases, and treatment was not remembered in one case. Preoperative examination of the shoulder showed limited and painful motion in thirteen cases, muscle atrophy about the shoulder in three, and subluxation of the joint in ten; all had deep tenderness over the front of the shoulder joint. Roentgenographic findings were negative in twenty-four cases, showed subluxation in three, calcium deposits in the subdeltoid bursa in one, a shallow glenoid fossa in one, a groove in the head of the humerus in one, roughness of the anterior glenoid rim in one, and roughness in the greater tuberosity and acromion in one.

All of the operations except one were done on Marine personnel. Eight cases have been followed for more than one year; the remaining cases have been followed for more than six months. In one case in the series, the operation failed, because the new attachment of the tendon pulled away from the acromion when time patient threw a football, four weeks after operation. In twenty-seven of the remaining thirty cases, the patients returned to full combat duty. The other three patients could not return to full duty, although the shoulder was stable. Follow-up letters have been received from two of the three patients, stating that they are doing heavy work without discomfort. In the remaining case there has been no further dislocation, and a follow-up letter from the patient's mother states that he does not want to work.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
D. BOSWORTH
PROGRESS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY FOR 1946 A Review Prepared by an Editorial Board of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: VII. CONDITIONS INVOLVING THE SHOULDER, NECK AND JAW
Arch Surg, January 1, 1949; 58(1): 97 - 106.
[Abstract] [PDF]