This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NICHOLSON, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by NICHOLSON, J. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1946;28:565-575.
© 1946 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


COMPOUND COMMINUTED FRACTURES INVOLVING THE ELBOW JOINT

Treatment by Resection of the Fragments

J. T. NICHOLSON 1

1 Captain, Medical Corps, United States Naval Reserve

Surgical resection of the fragments following a compound comminuted fracture involving the elbow joint was without major complications. The Procedure was carried out in the presence of open draining wounds, in the primary, intermediate, or secondary phase of the injury. The patient was ambulatory from the first day after operation. Elbowmotion was started after two weeks, and no mechanical support other than a sling was used.

The operative wound was closed primarily when penicillin was used. The temperature, pain, fusiform swelling, and drainage subsided after the resection. The operative wound healed primarily within two weeks. The healing time of the wound of injury depended upon the extent of soft-tissue damage.

The functional result was better when there was little loss of bone substance. If the trochlear surfaces of the humerus and ulna had been preserved, the elbow joint to all intents and purposes functioned normally. With the loss of the olecranon or the condyles of the humerus, the power of extension was sacrificed. The loss of the trochlear surface of the ulna added lateral instability in relaxation and slight loss of flexion power. The loss of the condyles of the humerus, alone or in conjunction with the proximal portions of the ulna and radius, resulted in about the same degree of additional loss in power of flexion against resistance and in further instability of the joint. Lateral instability of more than 45 degrees resulted in loss of ability to abduct the extended arm. Resection of two or three inches of the humerus resulted in a longer period before the power of flexion was regained, and in the most unstable joints. Even with a plastic repair, three inches was considered the greatest resection possible. The ability actively to supinate and pronate the forearm was, with one exception, dependent upon the absence of the head of the radius. Three patients were improved by a secondary operative removal of the head of the radius. The only patient who had a supination deformity failed to have the head of the radius removed. In all cases, pronation was more difficult to obtain than supination. A joint space did not reform at the site of the resected elbow, but fibrous scar tissue persisted between the bone ends six months after operation. Following operation, the formation of bone spicules at the bone ends was observed, but this had not resulted in loss of function.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
TraumaHome page
B. Youssef, S. Youssef, S. Ansara, and K. Porter
Fractures of the distal humerus
Trauma, April 1, 2008; 10(2): 125 - 132.
[Abstract] [PDF]