This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PONSETI, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by PONSETI, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1946;28:229-240.
© 1946 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


PATHOMECHANICS OF THE HIP AFTER THE SHELF OPERATION

IGNACIO PONSETI M.D.1

1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, State University of Iowa Hospitals, Iowa City

Dislocated or subluxated hips became more stable after a shelf operation, and the telescoping disappeared. However, the Trendelenburg sign remained positive, and consequently the limp persisted in all the patients with hip dislocation, treated by the shelf operation with the femoral head in a secondary acetabulum or in no acetabulum. When the shelf was built over the femoral head, after it had been placed in the primary acetabulum, the Trendelenburg sign became negative in only 18 per cent. of the patients. This sign remained positive in many patients, because, after the shelf operation, the femoral head usually became displaced under the shelf away from the line of gravity of the body. When the patient started to walk, the hip muscles were impotent to neutralize the increased rotatory effect produced by gravity upon this displaced center of motion. The Trendelenburg sign became negative only when the femoral head remained well centralized in the primary acetabulum. In these patients the shelf became smaller or even disappeared. On the other hand, in the patients whose Trendelenburg sign continued to be positive, the shelf became thicker and wider, due to the intermittent pressure of the displaced femoral head against the shelf.

From these observations, it was concluded that the aim of treatment for dislocation of the hip is not the construction of a big shelf, but the exact and permanent centralization of the femoral head in the acetabular cavity. The shelf alone is unable to accomplish this. The hip muscles must become strong and the capsule and ligaments of the hip joint must shrink to make secure the complete reduction of the femoral head. This may be accomplished in young patients by prolonged and well-directed functional after-treatment following reduction, with or without a concomitant shelf operation.

In the author's experience, the two main indications for the shelf operation are as follows: (1) In children over four years of age with congenital dislocation, reduced by the open method, a shelf may be created if the acetabulum is shallow; and (2) in patients with congenital or paralytic subluxation, or with subluxation of an old reduced congenital dislocation, the shelf operation is indicated when pain of static origin and a limp appear, usually after puberty. When reduction of the femoral head cannot be maintained in the primary acetabulum, the shelved hip will always be mechanically defective; a Schanz osteotomy is indicated in these cases.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
A. B. GILL
PROGRESS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY FOR 1946 A Review Prepared by an Editorial Board of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: X. CONGENITAL DISLOCATION OF THE HIP
Arch Surg, February 1, 1949; 58(2): 236 - 242.
[Abstract] [PDF]