This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FUNSTEN, R. V.
Right arrow Articles by LEE, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by FUNSTEN, R. V.
Right arrow Articles by LEE, R. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1945;27:395-400.
© 1945 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


HEALING TIME IN FRACTURES OF THE SHAFTS OF THE TIBIA AND FEMUR

ROBERT V. FUNSTEN M.D.1 and ROBERT W. LEE M.D.1

1 Fracture Clinic of the University of Virginia Hospital, Charlottesville

1. The long bones of the lower extremity are the biggest and strongest bones in the body. The force required to break them must necessarily be great, and the damage taking place at the time of injury is not only in the bone, but in the surrounding tissues. The speed of healing of fractures is usually proportionate to the amount of available circulation to and between the fragments.

2. In spite of the foregoing deduction, all the causes of delayed union and of non-union have not yet been determined.

3. The percentage of delayed union and non-union in fractures of the femur is not so great as in fractures of the tibia.

4. There are more cases of delayed union and non-union in the middle third of the tibia than in the upper and lower thirds.

5. The majority of our patients received some form of calcium therapy during their fracture treatment, with little recognizable effect on the end result.

6. In the instructions to patients and students, due consideration should be given to the slowness and uncertainty of the healing of fractures of the tibia and femur, so that patients may be prepared for the long period of time possibly necessary for the healing of these fractures.

7. The use of skeletal traction and the use of internal or external skeletal fixation in no way speeds the healing time of bone, and in some instances retards it, because of distraction, infection, or the osteolytic effect of the metals used.

8. In the series of cases here presented, circumstances in some instances necessitated the use of skeletal traction, plating, and external fixation (Haynes). In none did we feel that the results obtained by such methods were in any way superior to those of conservative treatment, when alignment could be maintained even at the expense of a loss of length of as much as three-quarters of an inch.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?