This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MacFarlane, Col. J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by MacFarlane, Col. J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1942;24:739-752.
© 1942 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


WOUNDS IN MODERN WAR

Col. J. A. MacFarlane R.C.A.M.C.1

1 Surgical Consultant to the Canadian Active Service Force

In conclusion, there are certain main principles, of the soundness of which the author is convinced at the present time.

1. In mobile warfare it becomes a matter of the greatest importance either to evacuate the wounded by air or, failing this, to bring the facilities for early surgery to the patient.

2. The advantages of the closed-plaster treatment are paramount. It allows for safe transportation over long distances without the necessity for dressing during the journey. As already noted in reports from the East, "those who have been subjected to débridement and plaster fixation traveled well and looked fit on arrival". Furthermore, continued closed-plaster treatment at the base hospital would seem to be the method of choice. Our experience in Canadian hospitals after eighteen months encourages us to adopt the method as routine treatment.

3. It is clear from our experience in England, also from reports in Libya, that war wounds should not be sutured.

4. The use of sulphanilamide as a prophylactic measure is not on sufficiently firm ground to warrant the impression which is held by some surgeons that it will constantly prevent gas gangrene and other infection if applied to a contaminated wound. The author knows of no prophylactic against gas-forming organisms other than the early removal of devitalized muscle. When such débridement has been carried out and local chemotherapy used, we have been unable to see evidence of increased healing or lessening of infection when compared with those cases in which similar surgical treatment without chemotherapy has been instituted. On the other hand, sulphonamides given by mouth as soon as possible after injury may cut down the incidence of severe streptococcus infection, particularly when such cases are delayed in reaching an organized operating center. The application of sulphonamides to superficial wounds, particularly burns, is of undoubted value, but such routine use on the deeper penetrating wounds does not lessen the urgency for surgical treatment.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
C. LYONS
Chemotherapy in the management of wounds.
JAMA, January 25, 1947; 133(4): 215 - 215.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
N. T. KIRK and F. M. McKEEVER
THE GUILLOTINE AMPUTATION
JAMA, April 8, 1944; 124(15): 1027 - 1030.
[Abstract] [PDF]