This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moore, B. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Moore, B. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1942;24:617-631.
© 1942 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


MACRODACTYLY AND ASSOCIATED PERIPHERAL NERVE CHANGES

Beveridge H. Moore M.D.1

1 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS

Five cases of macrodactyly are presented, in all of which pathological changes were found in the peripheral nerves. In one (a young adult), the changes were definitely classed as due to a neurofibroma. In the four others (all young children), the changes were an increase in endoneurial fibrous tissue, with evidence of degenerative changes in nerve fibers. Three of the four children showed at least some of the clinical stigmata of neurofibromatosis. It would seem then that the changes shown in these nerves may represent an early stage in the development of a neurofibroma. Case 3 is particularly suggestive in this regard.

The fact that local hypertrophy is so constantly associated with peripheral nerve pathology, would seem to indicate that there is a relationship between them. It is believed that the nervous system exerts some controlling action on the process of growth, and that the impaired nerves fail in this function, resulting in uncontrolled or uninhibited growth. Whether there are changes in the central nervous system which result in the change in the peripheral nerves is not known.

These observations seem to favor the neurogenic theory as the origin of at least certain types of congenital deformities. The author feels that the investigation of pathology in the peripheral nerves has been somewhat overlooked, and that more careful work along this line might be of great interest.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?