This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PEABODY, C. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by PEABODY, C. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1938;20:193-205.
© 1938 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


TENDON TRANSPOSITION

An End-Result Study

CHARLES W. PEABODY M.D.1

1 The Detroit Orthopaedic Clinic and the Orthopaedic Division of the Children's Hospital of Michigan

About ten years ago, the writer arrived at a stage in the practice of surgical relief of paralytic residual imbalance in which the application of certain physical and kinetic principles seemed logically to point to fairly precise indications for selection and utilization of muscle and tendon transference in a given presenting situation of paralytic residuals. Since then, 300 operations have been performed with these principles in mind, and it has been possible to check up on the results three or more years after operation in 215 of these cases. The results have been analyzed according to function and statics, with conclusions and indications derived from the findings in five of the most common and sharply defined situations. Tendon transposition has proved to be a most useful procedure in restoration of lost function, and frequently an imperative procedure in the prevention and control of imbalance deformity. Its utilization diminishes the frequency and the extent of stiffening procedures, sometimes as an adjunct to them and sometimes as a preferable substitute for them. Its success is as much dependent on the meticulous evaluation of the presenting static, dynamic, and kinetic conditions as on the technique of the operative procedure.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?