This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by COMPERE, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by ADAMS, C. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by COMPERE, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by ADAMS, C. O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1937;19:922-936.
© 1937 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


STUDIES OF LONGITUDINAL GROWTH OF LONG BONES

I. The Influence of Trauma to the Diaphysis

EDWARD L. COMPERE M.D.1 and CARROLL O. ADAMS M.D.1

1 The Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago

1. Minimal trauma to the shaft or to the metaphysis of a long bone, with or without interruption of the medullary blood supply, does not produce any definite increase in rate or extent of longitudinal bone growth.

2. Gross trauma, involving a considerable portion of the shaft of a long bone and necessitating extensive repair over a long period of time, does produce epiphyseal stimulation and longitudinal overgrowth.

3. The increased rate of growth continues only during the period of healing.

4. This growth stimulation appears to be secondary to the hyperaemia and increased vascularity of the bone and soft parts following the trauma and during the process of healing.

5. The longitudinal overgrowth which may accompany a fracture occurs regardless of whether or not there is initial shortening as a result of overriding or loss of shaft substance. This observation, together with the fact that overgrowth may also occur after gross trauma without loss of continuity of the shaft of a bone, such as excision of a full-thickness tibial bone graft, is further evidence to support the theory of local hyperaemia as the basic stimulus and that it is not a compensatory phenomenon.

6. Evidence that longitudinal bone growth may occur from the diaphysis or from the cartilage of the callus following fracture of the shaft is not well supported by the data presented.

7. Chronic localized inflammation of the diaphysis, due to an irritant foreign body, may result in marked bone proliferation with increased diameter of the shaft. There is some evidence that under these circumstances localized interstitial longitudinal growth may occur. This possibility is deserving of further investigation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?