This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SIEGLING, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by FAHEY, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by SIEGLING, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by FAHEY, J. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1936;18:439-444.
© 1936 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc

THE FATE OF TRANSPLANTED COW'S HORN

JOHN A. SIEGLING M.D.1 and JOHN J. FAHEY M.D.1

1 The Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago

Horn was used as a corticomedullary graft in experimental animals following open operation and fracture to determine its absorbability and its influence on bony union. Microscopic study of cases as late as seven and one-half months after operation revealed little, if any, evidence of absorption of the horn or stimulation of osteogenesis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?