This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TODD, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by BARBER, C. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by TODD, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by BARBER, C. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1934;16:53-64.
© 1934 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


THE EXTENT OF SKELETAL CHANGE AFTER AMPUTATION

T. WINGATE TODD F.R.C.S.1 and C. G. BARBER M.A., M.D.1

1 Anatomical Laboratory, Western Reserve University.

1. After amputations of both upper and lower extremities, the outstanding feature is a generalized osteoporosis in the bones of the mutilated limb, at first patchy but rapidly becoming uniform. It occurs especially near articular ends and muscular attachments and it involves the secondary trabeculae of the cancellous tissue but not the primary architectural features. After lower limb and forearm amputations, rarefaction is obvious in ten days and ceases to progress after three weeks from the date of amputation.

2. After amputations above the elbow, the osteoporosis continues to progress beyond the three-week limit but without destroying the architectural pattern at first. Within a few years there is actual reduction in dimensions of humeral stump, scapula, and clavicle, not explicable on the basis of failure of growth, though precocious union of epiphyses occurs after amputation during or before adolescence.

3. These postamputation phenomena of the upper arm differ from the subsequent changes in infantile and spastic palsy in their erratic distribution and the ultimate disorganization of architecture.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?