This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LIPPMANN, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LIPPMANN, R. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1932;14:118-126.
© 1932 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


THE USE OF AUSCULTATORY PERCUSSION FOR THE EXAMINATION OF FRACTURES

ROBERT K. LIPPMANN M.D.1

1 Adjunct Orthopaedist, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York City

Auscultatory percussion applied across fractures of the shaft of the femur, humerus, and clavicle may be so interpreted as to indicate the presence of a complete fracture, the relative position of the fragments, and, during the postoperative course, the development of bony union. The stethoscope bell and the percussing finger should be applied over bony prominences on either side of the fracture and the sound so elicited compared with that produced by the same procedure on the normal side. Sound alteration constitutes the criterion of the test. Pitch and quality changes result from free vibration of the separate fragments and, accordingly, signify complete fracture or incomplete union. Appreciable diminution in sound intensity indicates poor conduction and reflects absence of end-to-end contact. The chief merits of the examination method may be summarized as follows:

1. The application of the test is simple, rapid, and entails no discomfort to the patient.

2. The desired information is immediately obtainable.

3. For diagnostic purposes, the test is always available when x-ray facilities are not at hand.

4. In the hospital, it may be employed equally well with the patient on the orthopaedic table, in traction apparatus, in bed, or in a plaster cast, and is consequently applicable during, as well as following, the reduction.

5. For certain purposes, the method appears more accurate than x-ray or fluoroscopy. A. The presence of end-to-end contact may be established with certainty by auscultatory percussion whereas, with x-ray, the true displacement often appears magnified or reduced. (Distortion due to oblique exposure.) B. Determination of the degree of bony union attained is sometimes difficult with x-ray, particularly when plaster or over- abundant callus obscures the fracture area. Auscultatory percussion is in no way affected by these factors.

A diversity of other orthopaedic measures entails the sometimes difficult task of determining the presence of bony contact or bony joint fusion. In general, when the test is applied in such cases, its interpretation will follow the above outlined basic principles. The practical utility of the method in this field is being studied at the present time.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?