This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LINDSAY, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by HOWES, E. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LINDSAY, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by HOWES, E. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1931;13:491-501.
© 1931 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


THE BREAKING STRENGTH OF HEALING FRACTURES

MERRILL K. LINDSAY M.D.1 and EDWARD L. HOWES M.D.1

1 The Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Yale University.

1. A quantitative method is described and a basic curve developed, indicating the breaking strength of regenerating bone.

2. Strength first manifests itself by the sixth day and then increases rapidly to the twenty-first day. It was observed that the callus grew steadily larger during this time.

3. There is a period of decline in strength after the twenty-first day, during and following which time the callus decreases in size.

4. There is a secondary rise in strength from the thirty-third to the forty-fifth day.

5. A strength is attained on the twenty-first day which is comparable to that on the thirty-ninth, but a period of weakness exists between the two.

6. There is a direct-correlation between the results of this study and previously observed histological facts and clinical data.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
FAKE JDRHome page
W. B. Gregory jr
Effect of Insulin on the Healing of Bone Wounds in Albino Rats
Journal of Dental Research, May 1, 1965; 44(3): 487 - 492.
[PDF]


Home page
FAKE JDRHome page
W. B. Savchuck
A Comparison of Bone Growth in Normal and Strontium-Treated Rats
Journal of Dental Research, January 1, 1959; 38(1): 49 - 59.
[PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
H. M. SWEENEY and H. LAURENS
EFFECT OF CARBON ARC RADIATION ON HEALING OF BONE
Arch Surg, September 1, 1935; 31(3): 395 - 418.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
E. L. HOWES and R. M. McKEOWN
INFLUENCE OF A DIET RICH IN CASEIN ON THE STRENGTH OF BONE AND THE HEALING OF FRACTURES
Arch Surg, November 1, 1934; 29(5): 786 - 793.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
C. R. MURRAY
HEALING OF FRACTURES: ITS INFLUENCE ON THE CHOICE OF METHODS OF TREATMENT
Arch Surg, September 1, 1934; 29(3): 446 - 464.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
W. T. PEYTON, U. S. ANDERSON, and C. W. LAYMON
QUANTITATIVE STUDY OF THE RATE OF HEALING IN BONE: I. DESCRIPTION OF METHOD
Arch Surg, July 1, 1934; 29(1): 23 - 28.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
W. G. DOWNS Jr. and R. M. McKEOWN
HISTOLOGY OF HEALING FRACTURES IN RATS ON NORMAL DIETS
Arch Surg, July 1, 1932; 25(1): 94 - 107.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
W. G. DOWNS Jr. and R. M. McKEOWN
HISTOLOGY OF HEALING FRACTURES IN RATS ON DIETS LOW IN TOTAL SALT, CALCIUM AND PHOSPHORUS
Arch Surg, July 1, 1932; 25(1): 108 - 121.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
R. M. McKEOWN, M. K. LINDSAY, S. C. HARVEY, and E. L. HOWES
THE BREAKING STRENGTH OF HEALING FRACTURED FIBULAE OF RATS: II. OBSERVATIONS ON A STANDARD DIET
Arch Surg, March 1, 1932; 24(3): 458 - 491.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
P. D. WILSON, L. T. BROWN, M. N. SMITH-PETERSEN, J. G. KUHNS, E. F. CAVE, R. K. GHORMLEY, M. S. DANFORTH, G. PERKINS, A. VAN DESSEL, and C. H. BUCHOLZ
FORTY-SIXTH REPORT OF PROGRESS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY
Arch Surg, February 1, 1932; 24(2): 325 - 338.
[Abstract] [PDF]