This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by STEINDLER, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by STEINDLER, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1929;11:820-830.
© 1929 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


THE COMPENSATION TREATMENT OF SCOLIOSIS

A. STEINDLER M.D., F.A.C.S.

After observing the results of the compensation method for more than four years on about 150 cases, we feel free to assert that, in properly selected cases, a return to normal body balance by way of mobilization, compensatory curves, and satisfactory development of the active muscle power of the spine, is indeed possible. Because it preserves the function of the spine, this treatment seems to us a more natural and more desirable solution than the one offered by methods of forcible correction or operative fusion. At the same time, it is recognized that only a portion of the cases of scoliosis are suitable for this type of treatment. Yet it is, we believe, a matter of satisfaction to return a not inconsiderable proportion of cases to normal balance and complete muscle control, which otherwise would have been relegated to operative fusion, or an indefinite period of brace support. It is admitted that in failing to produce local correction of the primary curve, the immediate cosmetic results of the method seem to fall behind those of forcible correction. This, however, is more than offset by the reliability and permanency of the compensation results, and by the advantage of active and lasting muscular control of the spine.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
E. HAUSER
SCOLIOSIS: A FUNCTIONAL DECOMPENSATION
Arch Surg, June 1, 1937; 34(6): 1159 - 1171.
[Abstract] [PDF]