Copyright © 2007 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Commentary & Perspective

Commentary & Perspective on
"Disease-Specific Gender Differences Among Total Knee Arthroplasty Candidates"
by S.C. Petterson, MPT, PhD, et al.

Commentary & Perspective by
Charles R. Clark, MD*,
University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa

Posted November 2007

In this study, the authors found that women have a higher risk of the development of osteoarthritis and have higher rates of disability attributable to that disease. The authors believe that it is important to understand the impact of gender on disease and osteoarthritis-related impairment in arthroplasty candidates. I totally agree.

The authors used physical performance measures to assess how gender affects the type and magnitude of osteoarthritis-related impairment in arthroplasty candidates. The authors are aware of only one prior study on the topic, but that study was limited by the lack of a comparison group and because measurements of lower-extremity muscle strength were not reported1.

The present study includes 221 individuals (ninety-five men and 126 women). Multiple physical performance measures were analyzed. The authors found that women in the arthroplasty group had lower SF-36 physical component scores and Knee Outcome Survey scores in comparison with men, indicating greater reported disability. Women in both the control group and the arthroplasty group had significantly lower quadriceps normalized maximal volitional isometric contraction (p < 0.001) even when adjusting for age and body size. Furthermore, they found that gender-specific differences were magnified in arthroplasty candidates. Their data support the concept that gender-specific differences in strength and function are inherent. In addition, their data suggest that women are more adversely affected by osteoarthritis than men are and that women undergo arthroplasty later in the degenerative process than men do. Therefore, the timing of total knee arthroplasty may be important in terms of optimizing outcome.

The authors acknowledge that there are limitations to the study. Osteoarthritis of the contralateral knee was not evaluated, and the duration of symptoms in the involved knee was not recorded. They point out that future research should assess the impact of gender-specific differences longitudinally from the onset of symptoms to the time of total knee arthroplasty.

The impact of gender in total knee arthroplasty is a timely topic; however, there is little objective data in this regard. This study adds to our knowledge in an important way because it provides objective measures of performance. Knowledge of these gender-specific differences may be particularly important when counseling patients with regard to surgical decision-making because female patients may benefit from earlier surgical intervention. Strength and functional decline should be closely monitored in female patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. A delay in the surgical treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee in women may be associated with a less than optimal outcome. This study provides clinically useful information to help guide the orthopaedic surgeon with regard to the decision-making process related to the surgical management of women with osteoarthritis of the knee.

*The author did not receive any outside funding or grants in support of his research for or preparation of this work. Neither he nor a member of his immediate family received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center, clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the author, or a member of his immediate family, is affiliated or associated.

Reference

1. Kennedy D, Stratford PW, Pagura SM, Walsh M, Woodhouse LJ. Comparison of gender and group differences in self-report and physical performance measures in total hip and knee arthroplasty candidates. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:70-7.